Thursday, May 2, 2019

The Life of David Gale Death Penalty Movie Review

The Life of David Gale Death penalty - motion-picture show Review ExampleProven perpetrators of heinous criminal offences should be tried in court exhaustively, and when actually run aground guilty complete with exclusively the circumstantial evidence to boot should be convicted relative to the degree of the crime they committed. If a person is found guilty of murder, rape, kidnapping, torture and other similar crimes which could be categorized as inhuman, then immediately, he/she should be sent to the wipeout penalty straight a vogue. Otherwise, if in that respect is whatsoever doubt to his/her personal involvement and/or active participation, then it should be lowered to a bearing imprisonment or a similar long-term prison sentence. David Gales arguments atomic number 18 as follows 1) swell punishment is not a deterrent to the commission of crimes 2) there is a sprouting of phony well(p) testimony for the convicted felons 3) it is possible to condemn/convict innocent men 4) and a flawed justice governing body, among others, which are agreeable to a certain point. Yes, there is no proof that shows that death as punishment stop crime or the offenders. However, there is still that possibility that actually carrying out capital punishment rouse in some way instill fear among potential criminals and their devious plans. Fake testimonies are also achievable, and evict tug to innocent people being incarcerated, but at the end of the day, this is still a subjective argument. Likewise, there are jurors and judges who could be bought or manipulated, hence, the final verdict can actually be flawed. Still, it all boils down to the right people being placed as part of the jury and how objective they can really be. The choice is still done by the judges themselves with a strict screening force so if the verdict is faulty, then perhaps, the people who did the selection are themselves unsound with their assessment. As a pro-Death Penalty activist, I wou ld defend my standpoint by stating that even if human life is precious, as being maintain by the con-Death supporters or Abolitionists, it is something which was not respected by the crime offenders, hence, they no longer deserve to be given significance or distinctive worth. The flaws in the justice system cannot be avoided because no system can ever be perfect. The action taken by David Gale in orchestrating the death of Constance was a truly extreme act of proving his point to the Governor of Texas when he had this live interview pertaining to the numerous executions in the locality. Gale was somehow challenged by what the governor stated during this event name one innocent man that Texas has put to death in my tenure. It is something that not every man can do or attempt to do which is also related to the class lecture Gale delivered stating that life should be measured not by what youve bring home the bacon in terms of your desires, but those small moments of integrity, comp assion, rationality, even self-sacrifice. Self-sacrifice was the goal taken by both(prenominal) Constance and Gale in order to underscore the advocacy they were fighting for. Gales perspective is truly an idealistic way of looking at life, and this, he pushes to the ultimate when he fakes the death of

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.